Stakeholder Engagement in CER and PCOR

• Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, Conway PH, Daudelin D, Morrato EH, Leslie LK. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 27 (8):985-991, Jul 2012. PMID: 22528615. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22528615.
• Clancy CM. Getting to 'smart' health care. Health Affairs. 2006; 25(6):w589-w92. Available at: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/25/6/w589.full.html.
• Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf.
• Mallery C, Ganachari D, Fernandez J, et al. Innovative methods in stakeholder engagement: an environmental scan. Prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by American Institutes for Research, Rockville, MD; May 2012. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/tasks/sites/ehc/assets/File/CF_Innovation-in-Stakeholder-Engagement_LiteratureReview.pdf.
• McClellan M, Benner J, Garber AM, et al. Comparative effectiveness research: will it bend the health care cost curve and improve quality? Washington: The Brookings Institute; 2009. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2009/6/09%20cer%20mclellan/0609_health_care_cer.pdf.
• Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Available at: http://www.pcori.org.
• Roehr B. More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts. Br Med J. 2010;341:c4193. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c4193.

Module 1: Evidence Prioritization

• AHRQ Future Research Needs Reports. Future research needs for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; February 2012. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/412/952/FRN11_SleepApneaDiagnosis_20120207.pdf.
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). How are research topics chosen? Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/submit-a-suggestion-for-research/how-are-research-topics-chosen.
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Using deliberative methods to engage patients, consumers and the public. AHRQ Community Forum; December 2011. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/tasks/sites/ehc/assets/File/CF_deliberative_methods_webinar.pdf.
• Beitelshees AL, Veenstra DL. Evolving research and stakeholder perspectives on pharmacogenomics. JAMA. 2011;306(11):1252-1253. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3559013/.
• Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf.
• Fraser I. Organizational research with impact: working backwards. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2004;1 Suppl:S52-9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17129335.
• Galea S, Factor SH, Bonner S et al. Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York. Public Health Reports. 2001;116(6):530-539. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497380/.
• Gillies D. Identifying research priorities for the health care of children and adolescents. Contemporary Nurse. 2005;19(1-2):161-168. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16167445.
• Harvard Business School Press. Negotiation (Harvard Business School Essentials Series). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2003. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Negotiation-Harvard-Business-Essentials-Available/dp/1591391113.
• Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/Conflict-of-Interest-in-Medical-Research-Education-and-Practice/COI%20report%20brief%20for%20web.pdf.
• Institute of Medicine. Initial Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/ComparativeEffectivenessResearchPriorities.aspx.
• Malcolm C, Knighting K, Forbat L, Kearney N. Prioritization of future research topics for children's hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study. Palliative Medicine. 2009;23(5):398-405. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19304805.
• Malhotra D, Bazerman MH. Negotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and Beyond. New York: Bantam Books; 2008. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Negotiation-Genius-Obstacles-Brilliant-Bargaining/dp/0553384112.
• McClellan M, Benner J, Garber AM, et al. Comparative effectiveness research: will it bend the health care cost curve and improve quality? Washington: The Brookings Institute; 2009. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2009/6/09%20cer%20mclellan/0609_health_care_cer.pdf.
• O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto E, et al. Engaging stakeholders to identify and prioritize future research needs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD: June 2011. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/200/698/MFRNGuide04--Engaging_Stakeholders--6-10-2011.pdf.
• Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Available at: http://www.pcori.org.
• Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Draft national priorities for research and research agenda. PCORI; January 2012. Available at: http://www.pcori.org/assets/PCORI-Draft-National-Priorities-and-Research-Agenda.pdf.
• Phillips CJ, Fordham R, Marsh K et al. Exploring the role of economics in prioritization in public health: what do stakeholders think? European Journal of Public Health. 2011;21(5):578-584. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20817687.
• Roehr B. More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts. Br Med J. 2010;341:c4193. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c4193.
• Russell MW, Campbell LA, Kisely S, Persaud D. The development of community health indicators: a district-wide approach. Chronic Diseases in Canada. 2011;31(2):65-70. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21466756.
• Schur CL, Berk ML, Silver LE, Yegian JM, O'Grady MJ. Connecting the ivory tower to main street: setting research priorities for real-world impact. Health Affairs. 2009;28(5):w886-w899. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19671570.

Module 2: Evidence Generation

• Bogart LM, Uyeda K. Community-based participatory research: partnering with communities for effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions. Health Psychology. 2009;28(4):391-393. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854509/.
• Campbell, MK, Skea ZC, Sutherland AG, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic lavage in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a mixed methods study of the feasibility of conducting a surgical placebocontrolled trial (the KORAL study). Health Technology Assessment. 2010;14(5). Available at: http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon1405.pdf.
• Ellis N, Johnston V, Gargett S, et al. Does self-management for return to work increase the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation for chronic compensated musculoskeletal disorders? - Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeltal Disorders. 2010;11:115. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/11/115.
• Graffy J, Bower P, Ward E, et al. Trials within trials? Researcher, funder and ethical perspectives on the practicality and acceptability of nesting trials of recruitment methods in existing primary care trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:38. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2873514/.
• Herberman RB, Pearce HL, Lippman SM, Pyenson BS, Alberts DS. Cancer chemoprevention and cancer preventive vaccines--a call to action: leaders of diverse stakeholder groups present strategies for overcoming multiple barriers to meet an urgent need. Cancer Research. 2006;66(24):11540-11549. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17158189.
• Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):626-9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3081994/.
• Mazor KM, Sabin JE, Goff SL, et al. Cluster randomized trials to study the comparative effectiveness of therapeutics: stakeholders' concerns and recommendations. Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety. 2009;18(7):554-561. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19402030.
• McNamara R, Robling M, Hood K, et al. Development and Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Children and Teenagers Experiencing Diabetes (DEPICTED): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a communication skills training programme for healthcare professionals working with young people with type 1 diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:36. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829553/.
• Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;(3):CD004563. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16856050.
• Philpott S, Heise L, McGrory E, Paxton L. The challenge of defining standards of prevention in HIV prevention trials. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(4):244-8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21186207.
• Schmitt J, Langan S, Stamm T, Williams HC. Core outcome domains for controlled trials and clinical recordkeeping in eczema: international multiperspective Delphi consensus process. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(3):623-30. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20944653.
• Solberg LI, Glasgow RE, Unutzer J, et al. Partnership research: a practical trial design for evaluation of a natural experiment to improve depression care. Med Care. 2010;48(7):576-82. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20508531.
• Wang LH, Tsai YF, Chen JS, Tsay PK. Intention, needs, and expectations of cancer patients participating in clinical trials. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34(2):117-23. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21326029.

Module 3: Evidence Synthesis

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in the Effective Health Care Program. AHRQ Annual Conference; September 2010. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/legacy/about/annualconf10/janakiraman_mcpheeter_selby/janakiraman.HTM.
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Stakeholder Involvement in Improving Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by the AHRQ Effective Health Care Program Product Development Work Group, Rockville, MD; September 2011. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/357/794/Stakeholder-Involvement_Final-Report_20110926.pdf.
• Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, et al. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(11):1198-1207. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21463926.
• Atty G. School nursing in a Health Action Zone: how the service needs to change. Journal of Family Health Care. 2002;12(2):48-51. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=12415755.
• Cheng EM, Crandall CJ, Bever CT, Jr. et al. Quality indicators for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis. 2010;16(8):970-980. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921149/.
• Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S (Editors). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington: National Academies Press; 2011. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13059.
• Gagnon MP, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, et al. Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9:54. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671501/.
• Hanvoravongchai P, Warakamin B, Coker R. Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems: a case study in Thailand. Health Policy & Planning. 2010;25 Suppl 1:i53-57. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20966111.
• Jordans MJ, Tol WA, Komproe IH. Mental health interventions for children in adversity: pilot-testing a research strategy for treatment selection in low-income settings. Social Science Medicine. 2011;73(3):456-66. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21742426.
• Joynt GM, Loo S, Taylor BL et al. Chapter 3. Coordination and collaboration with interface units. Recommendations and standard operating procedures for intensive care unit and hospital preparations for an influenza epidemic or mass disaster. Intensive Care Medicine. 2010;36 Suppl 1:S21-31. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20213418.
• McNamara R, Robling M, Hood K, et al. Development and Evaluation of a Psychosocial Intervention for Children and Teenagers Experiencing Diabetes (DEPICTED): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of a communication skills training programme for healthcare professionals working with young people with type 1 diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:36. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829553/.
• Roberts GW, Irvine FE, Tranter S, Spencer LH. Identifying priorities for establishing bilingual provision in nurse education: a scoping study. Nurse Education Today. 2010;30(7):623-630. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20045227.
• Rose D, Thornicroft G, Slade M. Who decides what evidence is? Developing a multiple perspectives paradigm in mental health. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Supplementum. 2006;(429)109-114. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16445492.
• Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010 Jun;63(6):607-19. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20434023.
• Sutherland SE, Matthews DC. Conducting systematic reviews and creating clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: lessons learned. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2004;135(6):747-753. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=15270157.
• Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, et al. AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010;63(5):491-501. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=19540721.

Module 4: Evidence Interpretation

• Bae SJ, Paltiel AD, Fuhlbrigge AL, et al. Modeling the potential impact of a prescription drug copayment increase on the adult asthmatic medicaid population. Value in Health. 2008;11(1):110-118. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3476042/.
• Barth-Jones DC, Cheng H, Kang LY et al. Cost effectiveness and delivery study for future HIV vaccines. AIDS. 2005;19(13):w1-w6. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16103763.
• Buccoliero L, Calciolari S, Marsilio M. A methodological and operative framework for the evaluation of an e-health project. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2008;23(1):3-20. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17624883.
• Carr SM, Lhussier M, Forster N et al. An evidence synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research on component intervention techniques, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, equity and acceptability of different versions of health-related lifestyle advisor role in improving health. Health Technology Assessment. 2011;15(9):iii-iv. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21329611.
• Cashman SB, Adeky S, Allen AJ, III et al. The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(8):1407-1417. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2446454/.
• Ollendorf DA, Pearson SD. An integrated evidence rating to frame comparative effectiveness assessments for decision makers. Medical Care. 2010;48(6 Suppl):S145-52. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20473206.

Module 5: Dissemination and Application

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Promoting Your Public Report: A Hands-on Guide. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0040-EF; February 2012. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/value/pubrpthandson/.
• Anderson LM, Brownson RC, Fullilove MT, et al. Evidence-based public health policy and practice: promises and limits. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;28(5 Suppl):226-230. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=15894157.
• Arrington B, Kimmey J, Brewster M et al. Building a local agenda for dissemination of research into practice. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2008;14(2):185-192. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=18287926.
• Bowen DJ, Sorensen G, Weiner BJ, et al. Dissemination research in cancer control: where are we and where should we go? Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):473-85. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915900/.
• Canadian Institutes of Health. More About Knowledge Translation at CIHR. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html#.
• Griffiths P, Anderson A, Coyne C, Beastall H, Hill J. Implementing an interprofessional patient record. Clinical Medicine. 2011;11(2):128-131. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21526692.
• Hinton T, Gannaway D, Berry B, Moore K. The D-Cubed Guide: Planning for Effective Dissemination. Australian Teaching and Learning Council; 2011. Available at: http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/The%20D-Cubed%20guide%20-%20web%20and%20email%20version.pdf.
• Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-Can-Trust.aspx.
• Kennerly D, Millard M, Moore V. Development and dissemination of minimum standards of care for asthma. Journal for Healthcare Quality. 2000;22(3):22-28. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=11066916.
• Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436-8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=18647988.
• Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what? Annals of the NY Academy of Science. 1993;703:226-37. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26351.x/abstract.
• MacLean DR. Positioning dissemination in public health policy. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1996;87 Suppl 2:S40-3. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=9002342.
• NEHI. From Evidence to Practice: A National Strategy for CER Dissemination. NEHI; February 2011. Available at: http://www.nehi.net/publications/53/from_evidence_to_practice_a_national_strategy_for_cer_dissemination.
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Diffusion-Innovations-5th-Everett-Rogers/dp/0743222091/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1365112502&sr=1-1.
• Shea MA, Callis BP, Cassidy-Stewart H, Cranston K, Tomoyasu N. Diffusion of effective HIV prevention interventions--lessons from Maryland and Massachusetts. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2006;18(4 Suppl A):96-107. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16987092.
• Tabbers MM, Boluyt N, Offringa M. Implementation of an evidence-based guideline on fluid resuscitation: lessons learnt for future guidelines. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;169(6):749-58. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2859220/.

Module 6: Feedback and Assessment

• Aligning Forces for Quality (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation). How to get consumer feedback and input into websites. Available at: http://forces4quality.org/how-get-consumer-feedback-and-input-websites.
• Anton S, McKee L, Harrison S, Farrar S. Involving the public in NHS service planning. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2007;21(4-5):470-483. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17933377.
• Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006;62(2):178-188. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16406472.
• Farley DO, Damberg CL. Evaluation of the AHRQ patient safety initiative: synthesis of findings. Health Services Research. 2009;44(2p2):756-776. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2677039/.
• Hiatt K, Stelle C, Mulsow M, Pearson SJ. The importance of perspective: evaluation of hospice care from multiple stakeholders. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 2007;24(5):376-382. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17601833.
• Kirchner JE, Farmer MS, Shue VM, Blevins D, Sullivan G. Partnering with communities to address the mental health needs of rural veterans. Journal of Rural Health. 2011;27(4):416-424. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21967386.
• Kirsh B, Krupa T, Horgan S, Kelly D, Carr S. Making it better: building evaluation capacity in community mental health. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2005;28(3):234-241. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=15690736.
• Langley GL, Moen R, Nolan KM, et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Improvement-Guide-Practical-Organizational-Performance/dp/0470192410/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1365172696&sr=1-1.
• Lee YF, Altschuld JW, White JL. Effects of multiple stakeholders in identifying and interpreting perceived needs. Evaluation & Program Planning. 2007;30(1):1-9. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=17689309.
• Macdiarmid JI, Loe J, Douglas F, et al. Developing a timeline for evaluating public health nutrition policy interventions. What are the outcomes and when should we expect to see them? Public Health Nutrition. 2011;14(4):729-739. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20707947.
• Melnyk B, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. Available at: http://www.amazon.com/Evidence-Based-Practice-Nursing-Healthcare-Guide/dp/1605477788/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1365173310&sr=1-1.
• National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). MAPP Framework. Available at: http://www.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/mapp/framework/index.cfm.
• Ridge AL, Bero LA, Hill SR. Identifying barriers to the availability and use of Magnesium Sulphate Injection in resource poor countries: a case study in Zambia. BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10:340. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018452/.
• Preskill H, Jones N. A Practical Guide for Engaging Stakeholders in Developing Evaluation Questions (Focusing on What Matters Webinar). Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2011. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/en/research-publications/find-rwjf-research/2011/06/focusing-on-what-matters-webinar.html.
• Schlosser RW, Koul R, Costello J. Asking well-built questions for evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders. 2007;40(3):225-238. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=16876187.